Thursday, March 31, 2011

San Francisco Hotel Surveillence Footage Implicates San Francisco Police Department



Those doing defense work should be aware of the ongoing controversy involving video surveillance at the Henry Hotel in San Francisco. The controversy recently came into the public eye as the result of several cases beginning in December 2010 when a man was arrested for a drug possession charge at the Henry Hotel in San Francisco. Members of the SFPD Narcotics Unit acting on a tip from a confidential informant responded to the Henry Hotel and, according to the police report of the incident, officers knocked on the resident’s door, announced themselves and waited for a response. Hearing none, the officer wrote, officers slightly opened the door with a master key. Without entering the unit, officers then told the female resident they were freezing the room until they could obtain a search warrant. According to police reports of the incident, the woman then gave them verbal permission to search the premises while officers contacted headquarters and asked a unit to respond with a consent form she could read, according to the police report. A man inside the woman’s room was arrested after officers claimed to find heroin and crack on his person. However, surveillance video discovered by the San Francisco PD Office from the Henry Hotel shows that the four narcotics officers used a master key to barge directly into the room without knocking or obtaining consent. The video evidence directly contradicts the reports of the officers which were signed under penalty of perjury.

In a January incident, also at the Henry Hotel, one police officer is observed covering the surveillance camera with his hand while other officers enter a room and search it without consent or a warrant.

In yet another incident at the Henry Hotel in December, recently released surveillance footage from the Henry Hotel reveals a man was falsely arrested for drug possession by officers currently under federal investigation for perjury and conducting illegal searches.

The footage of the Dec. 2, 2010 arrest was released during a press conference earlier this month at the San Francisco Public Defenders office. The December 2nd incident involves the same officers that were involved in the December 23rd incident. In the video, a 29-year-old man, is seen walking into the Henry Hotel and ascending the stairs wearing a black jacket. Moments later, police using a master key enter the sixth floor room of two women suspected of selling drugs, where the man is a visitor. Officers find a white and gold jacket slung over a chair with drugs in the pocket and no identification. According to police reports, another officer states that he witnessed the man walk into the hotel wearing the same white and gold jacket. The man indicated that it was not his jacket when he was arrested, and police did not enter his black jacket into evidence, nor did they indicate in reports that he claimed it was not his jacket. The man, who served three weeks in jail over the incident, was freed when prosecutors dropped the case after a preliminary hearing.



Chief Attorney Matt Gonzalez of the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office said the seriousness of the matter could not be overstated.
“A free society cannot abide a culture of lawlessness by police,” Gonzalez said. “Those officers who lie under oath to magistrates should be prosecuted for their misconduct. They are no better than the criminals they purport to be in pursuit of.”


The latest footage brings the number of videotaped misconduct incidents involving SFPD officers to four. It is a good reminder to always check and see if surveillance video is available of traffic stops, street encounters, or other encounters where surveillance cameras might have captured the scene. Thanks to the San Francisco Public Defenders Office for their good work.

Turning Points


Sometimes it's hard to see how the Center for Justice makes a difference. Sometimes it's not.

When he came to the microphone on March 17th, Center for Justice attorney Rick Eichstaedt was fighting the lingering effects of a bad cold and gamely deflecting the awkwardness of having his last name mangled by the chairman of the Spokane County Planning Commission. And then he started speaking.

What soon became clear is that he had the planning commissioners attention before he'd even said hello. Eichstaedt was there to elaborate on a letter he'd sent a few days earlier, about why Spokane County's "emergency" move to locate a jail on rural land west of Spokane was unlawful.

The ten-page letter had done much of his talking for him. As the commission's vice chair, Pete Rayner would later tell a reporter for The Inlander, "We [the Planning Commission] all had questions, and those questions needed to be answered. The questions that came up just in the dialogue there, issues raised by the Center for Justice: Is what we're doing legal?...Everybody read [Eichstaedt's] letter and said, "we need to know answers to these things."

To say Eichstaedt's letter packed a punch is too subtle. Less than two weeks later, on March 29th, Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich and the county's three commissioners lined up beneath a rain-sheltering tent and, in a cascade of short speeches, removed the "emergency" jail from public consideration for the remainder of 2011. Referring to the threat of a possible legal action, they said they would not be bringing a $200 million or so bond issue to a vote this year.

A few observations about this:

1) As Rick explained in his letter, the purported jail "emergency" was baseless. The county had violated its own rules by not even bothering to document the emergency condition. Notwithstanding recent press about jail overcrowding, the prisoner population in Spokane County has actually declined in recent years, corresponding with nationwide trends. Moreover, as a consultant emphasized in a 2008 report to the county: "There is no relationship between crime and jail size. The size of a jail is determined, to a large extent, by the policy choices made [by] the system and the availability of alternatives." [italics in original.]

2) The campaign to build the new jail has involved a formidable sales push from the sheriff and the commissioners, including a sizable contract for former KHQ-TV reporter, Tobby Hatley, to help pitch the new jail scheme to voters.

3) Much of the land-use case law that Eichstaedt used to make his case about the illegality of building a new jail outside the county's urban growth area comes from his own case files. Especially in recent years, Spokane County has been a notorious violator of the letter and spirit of the state's Growth Management Act. Land use planning is about the most tedious thing government does. But it's a high stakes matter in Spokane where the "Near Nature, Near Perfect" landscape is constantly under assault by developers (aided by pro-development County Commissioners) who see profits in unmitigated urban sprawl. Working with groups like Futurewise and the Neighborhood Alliance of Spokane County, Eichstaedt and the Center for Justice have been quietly effective in fighting back against illegal development. It's not just a matter of protecting wetlands, streams and aesthetic green belts--unchallenged urban sprawl also comes at a high cost for taxpayers because of the demands it places on public infrastructure.
On the Center’s website we have a modest inventory of stories that exemplify the sort of cases we handle day in and day out to help ordinary people, without means, solve problems. The difference we can make in their lives is about as tangible as it gets. At the other end of the spectrum, Eichstaedt and the Center's timely intervention in the jail controversy illustrates what it means for us to be, as Breean Beggs once described it, "the community's law firm."

Ironically, it was Planning Commissioner Pete Rayner who connected the dots between the jail controversy and earlier debacles that have shaken public confidence in local government in recent years. "I don't want to be a part of a Bigelow Gulch or a River Park Square," Rayner told the Inlander. Perhaps it goes without saying that the Center and its lawyers were deeply involved in both controversies, fighting on behalf of the public interest in open government and due process.

As a former client, I've witnessed the importance of the Center’s presence in a very direct way. But it's more than that. I'm old enough to have been a progressive activist in Spokane/Eastern Washington in the days before the Center existed. This week's victory in the jail controversy just reaffirms what I've seen in the years since the Center for Justice opened its doors, which is that the law firm has fundamentally changed the way Spokane works. If you agree, I invite to go here and make a donation to support our work.

--Tim Connor

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Drug Violence in Mexico

This February 2011 report, Drug Violence in Mexico, from the Trans-Border Institute of the Joan B. Croc School of Peace Studies, University of San Diego, has statistics and information about the violence throughout Mexico.  The following is the executive summary of the report.

Government data shed new light on the extent of drug violence in Mexico.
Recently released official figures on homicides associated with organized crime report levels of violence that are significantly higher than those tracked by media accounts, which were previously the only source of information publicly available.

Violence has increased sharply under Mexican President Felipe Calderón.
Four years into the administration of President Calderón (2006-12), 34,550 killings have been officially linked to organized crime, a dramatic increase from the previous administration of President Vicente Fox (2000-06) when 8,901 cases were identified.

In 2010, levels of violence greatly surpassed the levels seen in previous years.
Over 15,000 organized crime killings occurred in 2010, comprising 44% of the total number accumulated during the Calderón administration and representing an increase of nearly 60% with respect to the previous year.

Organized crime killings are geographically concentrated in certain states.
56% of all homicides from organized crime in 2010 occurred in just four of Mexico’s 32 states (Chihuahua, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas, and Guerrero). Most others have had much lower levels of violence, and several states have been virtually untouched by violence (Baja California Sur, Campeche, Querétaro, Tlaxcala, and Yucatán)

Over 70% of the violence in 2010 was concentrated in just 80 municipalities.
The top five most violent municipalities in 2010 were Ciudad Juárez (2,738 cases), Culiacán (587), Tijuana (472), Chihuahua (670), and Acapulco (370), which together accounted for 32% of all the drug-related homicides in 2010.

Several areas saw sharp increases due to new clashes among drug traffickers.
Four states experienced large, sudden spikes in violence during the course of the last year: San Luis Potosí (from 8 homicides in 2009 to 135 in 2010), Tamaulipas (90 to 209), Nayarit (37 to 377), and Nuevo León (112 to 604).

Violence increasingly targeted government officials and civilians in 2010.
An unprecedented number of elected officials, police, military, and civilians have been caught in the crossfire, including 14 mayors and 11 journalists.

Recent progress in dismantling drug cartels could have unpredictable effects.
In 2010, the Mexican government’s counter-drug efforts led to the capture of several high-profile traffickers, including Teodoro “El Teo” García Simental, Edgar “La Barbie” Valdez, and Nazario “El Chayo” Moreno. Authorities believe these arrests may help bring a reduction, if not an end to the violence, though the disruption of organized crime groups could also increase violence among traffickers.

Full report can be read here.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Agents Can Delay Miranda Warnings in Some Cases

(AP) — After being criticized for providing Miranda warnings in terrorism cases, the FBI has reminded its agents that in some instances they can question terrorist suspects without immediately reading them their rights.

The Justice Department said Thursday the FBI guidance issued late last year was a reminder that investigators can delay telling suspects of their rights to an attorney and to remain silent when there is immediate concern for the safety of the public.

The guidance outlines how to use the public safety exception when appropriate.

The guidelines do not change Miranda or the public safety exception, which the Justice Department does not have the authority to alter because they flow from court decisions based on the Constitution.

"The evolving nature of the terrorist threat demands that we keep the men and women on the front lines advised of all lawful and appropriate tools available to them to identify, locate, detain, and interrogate terrorism suspects," the Justice Department said in a statement.

The FBI guidance was issued months after Attorney General Eric Holder offered to work with Congress on a law that would let law enforcement delay constitutional Miranda warnings to terror suspects.

Constitutional lawyers and former prosecutors have suggested that Congress could craft such a terrorism exception that could last up to 48 hours — longer than the court-mandated public safety exception that already allows law enforcement to hold off Miranda warnings for a short period during emergencies to save lives.

The terrorism cases of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and Faisal Shahzad touched off a political debate last year between the Obama administration and Republicans on Capitol Hill over giving Miranda warnings to terror suspects.

Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian, was charged with trying to explode a bomb concealed in his underwear as his plane approached Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. Abdulmtallab was questioned for under an hour before being given a Miranda warning.

Shahzad is the U.S. citizen of Pakistani origin charged in last year's Times Square bombing plot.

Shahzad was questioned for about four hours before he was read his rights.

FBI officials have said both suspects cooperated with investigators and provided information after the Miranda warnings were provided.

"Where our laws provide additional flexibility, we must empower our counterterrorism professionals to leverage it," President Barack Obama's chief counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, said in remarks prepared for a public appearance last Friday.

"Our law enforcement officers deserve clarity," Brennan said. "And that is why at the end of 2010, the FBI provided guidance to agents on use of the public safety exception to Miranda, explaining how it should apply to terrorism cases."

The public safety exemption was used by FBI agents to question both men before they were given Miranda warnings, Brennan said. Once the immediate threat to public safety was addressed, the warnings were given to both, he added.

Abdulmutallab, charged with conspiracy and attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction, is scheduled to go to trial next October.

Shahzad pleaded guilty to terrorism and weapons charges and was sentenced to life in prison.

The Wall Street Journal first reported on the FBI guidance.

Full article from the AP can be found here.



Financial Statement Fraud

5/2/2011 - 5/3/2011

Holiday Inn Cleveland South - Independence
6001 Rockside Road
Independence, OH
Hotel Phone: +1 (216) 524-8050
Room Rate: $89 single, double (subject to availability)*
Hotel Cut-off Date: 4/1/2011
Early Registration Deadline: 4/1/2011

The complexity of financial statement fraud has received considerable attention over the past few years and will continue to cause concern. This course is designed for those who regularly review and evaluate financial statements. Auditors, both internal and independent, will benefit from an enhanced understanding of what the numbers mean and the increased ability to detect indicators of fraud.

This two-day, instructor-led course also discusses what the professional responsibilities of the financial professional are in relation to the accuracy of statements, especially in light of new legislation and revised fraud standards.




Monday, March 21, 2011

Some Prosecutors and Judges Welcome End of Death Penalty

Following the repeal of the death penalty in Illinois, some state prosecutors and judges have pointed to potential benefits to the criminal justice system. Kane County State’s Attorney Joe McMahon recently said that abolishing the death penalty meant that murder trials in the county could come to a conclusion more quicly. McMahon said, “To the extent that we can bring these cases to resolution sooner, and help the families of the victims get some measure of closure and allow the healing process to begin sooner, [it] will be helpful.” Judge Keith Brown, chief judge of the 16th Judicial Circuit, said that the lack of the death penalty will ease some of the burden of allocating additional resources to murder trials. Judge Brown noted that, “prosecuting murders should become less time consuming and less expensive, as the county and the state will no longer need to pay additional attorney’s fees for defendants, pay to bring in additional juries or pay staff and court costs for extended trials.”

Read more.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Tales of a Public Defender Investigator - Myopic Vision

From our friends over at Tales of a Public Defender Investigator:

This is shot of the World Trade Center as it appeared when it was under construction on July 16, 1973.The original image is on a Kodachrome slide and was taken with a Honywell Pentax 35 mm camera with a shutter speed of 1/256 of a second and an apperture of f5.6

Is this useful data? Yes. Is this an accurate depiction of the Twin Towers as they appeared on the date indicated above? Again, Yes. Is it relevant to this blog? Probably not; but its not hurting anything to post it here in this column and it may prove useful someday.

Unfortunately, this is often the prevailing logic when preparing a client's defense includes crime scene or evidence photography. Sure, it may be nice to have a set of good quality, well documented photos in the file but its much better to go out in the field to create a series of images that either help prove a client's case or dispute some portion of the State's case. Sometimes the person ordering the photos loses "focus" and forgets to explain the purpose of these visual aids; much to the frustration of the itinerant photographer. A brief conference should resolve questions and solidify the puropse of a request of this nature.

Original post can be found here.

Paper Jam


Last fall, Ken Hoeche and his family constructed a simple wooden cross to mark the grave of his son, Jerod Hoeche, who died Nov. 18 in a rollover crash near Medical Lake.

Hoeche says he would like to place a more permanent marker on Jerod’s grave, but he is still awaiting a final accident report to send to an insurance company.

On Monday, Hoeche (pronounced “hay-key”) learned his records request is being processed and he should get the report — on or about May 1.

Hoeche’s tale of waiting months for the Police Records Division to fulfill public records requests is not unusual these days.

The division lost five clerks in the latter stages of 2010 in a hiring freeze intended to help limit Spokane’s general fund budget shortfall. With fewer clerks, the records division has suffered. Once clear of backlogs and able to turn around records requests quickly — sometimes in the same shift as the request was made — the department is now swamped by a nearly 1,500-document backlog and an announced wait time of 90 to 120 days to fulfill a request.

Nobody likes it. Not Hoeche, who will have waited more than five months. Not Bob West, who is also awaiting a final accident report to free up insurance monies for his sister Debra, who suffered skull fractures and broken ribs when she was hit by a pickup truck while crossing a downtown street. West learned on Monday it will be months before he sees that report.

“In the meantime, I have bills,” West says of the cost of caring for his sister, who is still hospitalized.

Theresa Giannetto, the department’s records manager, also does not like the lower level of service in her office. Every day, she says, people like Hoeche and West call or visit to plead for a document that will help end a financial burden during a traumatic time.

“Ninety days serves no one’s needs,” she says. Media and watchdog groups are also affected.

Local civil rights attorney Breean Beggs says access to records “is an important function of government.

“Media and public interest groups are trying to serve the public. The more sunshine on government, the better decisions get made by government leaders and the electorate,” he says. “The vicious cycle is when you don’t provide access, the citizens don’t trust you, and then they don’t vote to provide tax money to provide the services.”

The service windows inside the Public Safety Building have been cut from three to two and are closed entirely on Wednesdays so clerks can try to catch up, Giannetto says.

“The people down there [at records] are super nice, but I’m trying to put closure on this for not only me, but for [Jerod’s] wife and his mother and his brothers,” Hoeche says. “I’ve been trying to get a headstone. We’re not rich.”

Hoeche doesn’t understand the lengthy delays when, as he puts it, “we are in a computer age.”

Bob West is even more frustrated. As a city probation officer, West can access police files. “I can get the police report myself by just pushing a button … but that’s illegal,” he says.

West has used his access in a different way, taking his complaints about short staffing to Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick and Mayor Mary Verner.

West, a city employee, understands layoffs, he says, but he’s still frustrated by the loss of service.

It’s uncertain if West’s complaints have born fruit, but last Friday, Giannetto tells The Inlander, she was authorized to hire two more clerks.

To be clear, the clerks do far more than public records requests. They confirm arrest warrants and court documents — information vital to officers on duty, Giannetto says. Clerks also post runaway and missing persons reports and process gun sales, concealed weapons permits and fingerprint fees.

Often, Giannetto says, the department would fail to meet the mandated 72-hour turnaround on warrants and, she adds, “We had never passed a Washington State Patrol or FBI audit.”

The pay is often lower than similar clerk jobs in other city departments, which, coupled with crappy hours and high stress, led to the high turnover rate.

“I was thankful to have only lost five [positions],” Giannetto says.

Mike Smith, the Local 270 union rep that covers records workers, says there was little the union could do last year.

“Management still has the right to set staffing levels. We can do things as a union but we can’t dictate and we can’t scream about staffing levels,” Smith says.

Tim Ford, the Washington Assistant Attorney General who is the ombudsman for open government, says he’s not heard of any other records division in the state in such dire straits.

And while it is true that the department isn’t blowing any official deadline on fulfilling requests, Ford says a three- to four-month wait for records is unacceptable.

“You still have to try to provide the fullest assistance,” Ford says. “Our model rules say you should not use the same estimate for all requests. Because some requests are simple, and some are complex.”

Mayor Mary Verner says the records division was not targeted for staff reductions.

“Absolutely not. I personally have a strong commitment that we need to be responsive to records requests. They are a key piece to transparency and accountability in government,” she says.

In addition to authorizing the hire of two clerks, Verner says that in late February she convened a “project team” from staffers in various departments that handle records requests to brainstorm ideas for better handling requests.

In the meantime, Giannetto says she and her staff are working as hard as they can to keep from sliding deeper into the hole.

Article at the Inlander can be found here.

Agency Seizes Georgia’s Supply of Execution Drug

(AP) — The Drug Enforcement Administration said Tuesday that it had seized Georgia’s supply of a lethal injection drug because of questions about how it was imported.

Chuvalo Truesdell, an agency spokesman, said he did not know if other states’ supplies of the drug, sodium thiopental, were being collected. The seizure comes less than two months after a convicted killer was executed in Georgia, despite his raising questions about where the state had obtained the drug, an anesthetic, and whether it had expired.

Corrections officials released documents this year that showed Georgia obtained the drug from Link Pharmaceuticals, which was bought five years ago by Archimedes Pharma Ltd. Both are British companies.

The drug was used in January to execute Emmanuel Hammond, who was convicted of killing a preschool teacher. Mr. Hammond’s lawyers sought a delay, claiming the drug came from a “fly-by-night supplier operating from the back of a driving school in England.” They said it could have been counterfeit.

The United States Supreme Court rejected the argument.

Joan Heath, a spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Corrections, said state officials were not concerned with the quality of the drug. “We contacted the D.E.A. and asked them for a regulatory review, and that’s what we’re doing,” she said.

The Danger of Threatening Inevitable Consequences During an Interrogation

 
A recent Frontline episode dealt with interrogation techniques and false confessions. The presented case involved the 1997 rape and murder of Michelle Bosko from Norfolk, VA. The following is a synopsis of facts as reported by Frontline:
 
The victim's husband, who was a sailor in the navy, discovered her body and sought help from the next door neighbor, a fellow sailor named Daniel Williams, who then contacted the police. While the husband had an air-tight alibi, suspicion focused on Williams. Therefore, they asked him to come to the station for a voluntary interview which eventually turned into an 11 hour interrogation. During the interrogation, Williams was administered a polygraph examination which he was falsely told indicated deception. After being threatened with the death penalty, Williams confessed to the rape and murder to avoid execution. In his initial confession he stated that he struck the victim with a shoe and beat her to death. Following the autopsy it was determined that the victim died from stab wounds and strangulation. Williams was re-interrogated and, after the detective revealed the victim's actual cause of death, gave a second confession consistent with the autopsy findings.
 
Four months later, the crime lab determined that Williams' DNA did not match crime scene evidence. Rather than doubt the integrity of Williams' confession, the police were convinced that there must have been another perpetrator.
 
Ultimately this case would consist of eight men being charged; five of them confessing but only one DNA match would be found. This case became known as the Norfolk Four.
 

 
  • Why did four innocent suspects confess to murder and rape?
  • What tactic should never be employed during an interrogation?
 

 

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

New FBI Chief Search Continues

From Ticklethewire
The FBI Agents Association’s endorsement Tuesday of ex-FBI agent Mike Mason to head the FBI in September offers no guarantees, but it could raise his profile as a candidate. He would be the first African-American to head the agency.

Mason, who served in the FBI for 23 years, and currently heads security as Verizon, was a popular figure at the FBI among the troops. He headed the field offices in Sacramento and Washington and retired from the agency in 2007 as executive assistant director in charge of the Criminal Division at headquarters. Mason is native of Chicago, which can’t hurt in the Obama administration.

It comes as no surprise that the Agents Association endorsed a former agent. It has often expressed a feeling that a former federal agent should have the job. The job has never gone to a current agent.

Director Robert S. Mueller III will retire in September after serving out his 10-year appointment that began in September 2001. His tenure has been met with mixed results inside the bureau, particularly among some who were considered loyalists of his predecessor Louis Freeh, who had been a former agent.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Tribal Law and Order Act



For additional information on the Tribal Law and Order Act, see the National Indian Law Library collection, here.

Monday, March 7, 2011

2011 Idaho Crimes Against Children Conference

Providing Instruction, Strategies, and Best Practices Information to Protect Child Victims and Prosecute Offenders.

June 6th & 7th, 2011

Boise Centre On The Grove

850 W Front St Boise, ID 83702
$99.00/* Space is limited register early.

WHO SHOULD ATTEND?

Law Enforcement, Child Protective Services, Prosecution, Social Workers, Children's Advocacy, Therapy, and Medicine.

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS:

Don Robinson (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Don Robinson is a supervisory Senior Resident Agent currently assigned to the Coeur d’Alene, Idaho field office. Don and agents under his supervision played a vital role in the investigation of the triple homicide and related child abduction by Joseph Edward Duncan. Don will perform a case study on the Duncan case, which originated in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

Richard Walter: Richard Walter is a forensic psychologist. Richard has interviewed over 20,000 convicted felons during his twenty-two year career. Richard developed a number of psychological classifications for violent crime and he is a co-founder of the Vidooq Society, an exclusive organization of forensic professionals dedicated to solving cold cases. He co-authored Profiling Killers: A Revised Classification Model for Understanding Sexual Murder. Richard is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine & Clinical Forensic Medicine, and a Fellow of the Australian College of Biomedical Sciences. Richard has lectured to police organizations throughout the United States, England, Scotland, Turkey, Australia, and China and he has been featured on programs for ABC, CBS, A&E, TLC, and Court TV.

Chief Tom Lanier (United States Marshals Service) - What the National Sex Offender Targeting Center does including information on the Adam Walsh Act.


The Effect of Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials

A study recently published in the journal Criminology meaured the effects of victim impact evidence (VIE) on the likelihood of the jury returning a death sentence. The study was conducted by Professors Raymond Paternoster and Jerome Deise of the University of Maryland.

It involved 135 participants who watched a video recording of an actual capital trial. Seventy-three participants watched the full video, while the remaining 62 participants watched a version with the victim impact evidence (typically, statements about the value of the victim and the effect his or her death has had on the rest of the family) edited out. Among those who viewed the victim impact evidence, 62.5% said they would impose a death sentence on the offender, while only 17.5% of those who did not view this evidence would have done the same. Among those who did not view victim impact evidence, 44.4% said they would impose a sentence of life without parole and another 38.1% would have voted for a straight life sentence.

The study concluded that, "those who viewed victim impact testimony perceived significantly more harm and suffering inflicted on the victim’s family, a greater emotional loss inflicted on the family by the murder, and were significantly less likely to think that the victim’s family was coping well with the murder… those who viewed VIE and those who actually imposed a death sentence were significantly more likely to think that a sentence of death would help the victim’s family find closure or help them recover from their loss.”

Read more here.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

I-Pad 2: Steve Jobs fills us in on New Product



The I-Pad works as a great investigative tool: its' uses are limitless. It is great for taking discovery, audio, and video files on the road to review with witnesses or use if the client is detained in jail. It has great mapping capabilities, one can have a witness write and "sign" a statement like a tablet, record a statement, draw a diagram, and carry music photos and movies as well. And everything one does in the field can be uploaded or emailed back to the office.

New options on the next model include a camera for video chat, photo options, increased speed, and smaller size. Steve Jobs spoke with NPR about the new model. Interview available here.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

GPS Tracking Podcast and Other Resources

We have blogged about law enforcement use of GPS tracking (search collected here) and, in doing some research on the topic recently, discovered some interesting resources of note when working on GPS tracking cases. The Department of Homeland Security has a podcast collection which includes this interesting transcript on GPS tracking and its use in federal law enforcement. Rockwell International, the pioneer of GPS, has some interesting resources that include information on the products that they sell to law enforcement for tracking. Finally, Wikipedia has some remarkably cool articles for the novice in need of background into GPS technology and its various uses.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Tribal Courts Expand: New Law Gives Tribal Courts Authority To Try Felonies

From KUOW

Tribal courts are largely invisible to non–Indians — but they're about to get more powerful. Federal authorities have traditionally handled the most serious crimes on reservations, but tribal officials say they haven't done enough. And reservations are facing a crisis of violent crime. A new federal law expands the powers of tribal courts. It even allows tribal judges to send people to jail longer. But the courts have a lot to do before they can take advantage of these changes.

Full article can be found here.

US Airways Subpoena Compliance

Scott Hunter, Administrative Assistant,
Security Office, US Airways
Direct Line:  480.693.8204

Subpoenas can be faxed to 480.693.8206

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

22nd Annual ACFE Fraud Conference and Exhibition


From the ACFE: The 22nd Annual ACFE Fraud Conference and Exhibition will address the challenges and critical issues faced by fraud fighters during top-level educational sessions and participate in unparalleled networking opportunities with the premier practitioners and thought leaders in today’s fight against fraud.

22nd Annual ACFE Fraud Conference and Exhibition Keynote Speakers have been announced. See the lineup here.